A real B2B lead list, not a mock. 18 named decision-makers across 7 SaaS sales-tech companies (lemlist, Snov.io, Close, Woodpecker, Lusha, Salesflare, Reply.io). Sourced from LinkedIn, verified with Hunter.io. Emails masked for privacy in the public sample. This is what a properly built list actually looks like before it lands in your sequencer.
Public PDF. Two pages. Emails masked. Grab it, open it in ten seconds, decide if the methodology fits your outbound workflow.
No email gate on this one. If you want the full methodology and the tracker template too, they live at the bottom of this page.
Sourced through Hunter.io Domain Search. Structured as CSV-ready columns.
The whole table fits on one page. Here's the shape of it.
| Company | Industry | Sample contact | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| lemlist | B2B SaaS · Outreach | CEO, CPO, VP Growth, Growth Manager | Catch-all (flagged) |
| Salesflare | CRM Software | Co-Founder | Direct |
| Reply.io | Sales Engagement SaaS | VP of Product | Direct |
| Woodpecker | Email / Sales Automation | CMO, Director of Product Marketing, Sales Manager | Catch-all (flagged) |
| Snov.io | B2B Lead-Gen SaaS | Head of Product, 2× Revenue Managers | Direct |
| Close | CRM Software | CEO, VP Product & Engineering, VP Engineering | Catch-all (flagged) |
| Lusha | Sales Intelligence | Chief Delivery Officer, Director of Product Management, Senior RevOps Manager | Catch-all (flagged) |
Emails are masked in the sample. In a full delivery they land verified, complete, and ready to import.
Every step below is reproducible. If you use the same tools, you'll get the same quality. Most lead lists on the market skip half of these steps and it shows in the bounce rate.
Industry, job titles, company size, geography, exclusions. Get this right and the whole list improves. Skip it and every step downstream compounds the noise.
Target accounts and named people pulled from LinkedIn and Hunter's Domain Search. No generic info@ addresses, no shared inboxes. Real humans with titles that match the buying committee.
Hunter's verifier runs on every address. Only "verified" or "verified (catch-all)" passes. Catch-all domains are flagged in amber so the sender knows what needs re-confirmation before send.
Clean sheet with name, title, company, website, verified email, source, notes. Drops straight into any CRM or sequencer. No cleanup required on the buyer side.
A color-coded tracker so no lead gets lost between "sent" and "meeting booked". Six statuses covering the full inbound reply flow.
Written progress notes as the list is built, quality flags along the way, and targeting adjustments based on what replies. Nothing gets lost in Slack pings or DM threads.
Four screenshots. Domain Search on two target companies, then verifier calls on individual addresses. This is exactly the flow that produced the 18-lead sample.
The 18-lead sample was built with exactly this two-step flow. If you want to run the same workflow on your ICP, Hunter's free tier covers it end-to-end.
Two tools do 90% of the work: a finder and a verifier. Both offer a real free tier so you can reproduce this workflow today.
Hunter's Domain Search is what pulled the 18 decision-makers on the sample. You give it a company domain, it returns named contacts with roles and confidence scores. The Verifier is bundled in the same account, so finding and verifying happens in one place. Free plan gives you 25 searches per month with the same Domain Search and Verifier features. Enough to build a small starter list before you decide to pay for volume.
Snov's free tier bundles finder, verifier, and a light cold-email sender in the same 50 credits per month. If you want to test the whole outreach flow end-to-end on a free plan, Snov is the shortest path. Slightly less accurate than Hunter on international domains but broader coverage on standard B2B targets and the Chrome extension on LinkedIn is strong.
Both tools were tested hands-on for our Hunter vs Snov review. We flag where each one wins so you don't pick the wrong one for your workflow.
Two more PDFs sit alongside the sample list. Same source, same voice, all free.
A color-coded tracker for any inbound flow. Six statuses (New, Followed up, Closed - Won, Closed - Lost, No response) plus pipeline summary and win rate. The example is a Facebook Marketplace flow so the pattern is visible, but the structure works for cold email replies, DM prospects, and referral leads with no changes.
The step-by-step process behind the sample list. Six steps from ICP lock to reporting, the tools used at each step, and what the deliverable looks like. Reproducible if you use the same stack.
Real list. The 18 contacts were sourced through Hunter's Domain Search on real company domains, and the roles are what those companies publicly list. Emails are masked in the public PDF so the individuals aren't exposed, but the structure, verification status, and role coverage is exactly what a full delivery looks like.
Publishing verified emails on a public page would violate the reasonable expectation those individuals have that their address stays inside a professional context. The mask keeps the sample useful (you see the shape of the delivery) without turning it into a scrape target. A full paid delivery hands over the unmasked, verified addresses directly.
Yes. Follow the six-step methodology in the PDF using Hunter (finder + verifier) or Snov (finder + verifier + light sender). The 18-contact sample sits within Hunter's free 25-searches-per-month tier, so you can rebuild something equivalent for a small ICP without paying.
A catch-all mail server accepts every address at a domain, whether the mailbox exists or not. Hunter can confirm the domain accepts mail, but it can't confirm the specific mailbox is real without an SMTP probe (which many domains block). We flag these amber so you can decide whether to run a second verification pass or accept the risk before sending.
Hunter is the sharper focused finder for operators with a paid sender already in place. Snov is the smarter starter for solos and freelancers who want find + verify + a light cold-email sender in one freemium plan. Full head-to-head in our Hunter vs Snov review.
Yes, on a small-batch basis. Reach out at hello@emailtoolshub.com with your ICP, target volume, and any constraints. Free sample sent before any commitment so you can check the quality on your own domain space first.
19 pages on cold email deliverability, 50 subject lines, 12 templates. Free PDF, delivered to your inbox. Complements the lead list well because a good list without a working sequence is a wasted list.